<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Michelle Obama&#8217;s $447 Snack!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.anonymoushints.com/2008/10/23/michelle-obamas-447-snack/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.anonymoushints.com/politics/michelle-obamas-447-snack/</link>
	<description>Wacky News And A Little Sexy Fun!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 18:56:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.anonymoushints.com/politics/michelle-obamas-447-snack/comment-page-1/#comment-342</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 03:29:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anonymoushints.com/blog/2008/10/23/michelle-obamas-447-snack/#comment-342</guid>
		<description>Sarah Palin has said that they are not her clothes. She is going to donate them to charity as soon as she&#039;s done with them. I don&#039;t want to get in an argument about who are the elitists in this campaign, since it&#039;s obviously the Obama&#039;s.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sarah Palin has said that they are not her clothes. She is going to donate them to charity as soon as she&#8217;s done with them. I don&#8217;t want to get in an argument about who are the elitists in this campaign, since it&#8217;s obviously the Obama&#8217;s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MrProsser</title>
		<link>http://www.anonymoushints.com/politics/michelle-obamas-447-snack/comment-page-1/#comment-341</link>
		<dc:creator>MrProsser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 01:59:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anonymoushints.com/blog/2008/10/23/michelle-obamas-447-snack/#comment-341</guid>
		<description>It is not just that it might not be totally accurate, she wasn&#039;t in NY at the time, so far it seems it is totally inaccurate.  In fact it appears to be a complete and utter lie.

At least with Sarah Palin there seems to be more than some anonymous rumour.  While I think it is pretty irrelevant stuff I don&#039;t see it as being very unfair to talk about this.  And using phrases like &quot;some new clothes&quot; is a bit misleading isn&#039;t it?  In a few months it has been $150000 of new cloths.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is not just that it might not be totally accurate, she wasn&#8217;t in NY at the time, so far it seems it is totally inaccurate.  In fact it appears to be a complete and utter lie.</p>
<p>At least with Sarah Palin there seems to be more than some anonymous rumour.  While I think it is pretty irrelevant stuff I don&#8217;t see it as being very unfair to talk about this.  And using phrases like &#8220;some new clothes&#8221; is a bit misleading isn&#8217;t it?  In a few months it has been $150000 of new cloths.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.anonymoushints.com/politics/michelle-obamas-447-snack/comment-page-1/#comment-340</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 01:24:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anonymoushints.com/blog/2008/10/23/michelle-obamas-447-snack/#comment-340</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s funny how the news papers have to retract a story that may not be totally accurate about Michelle Obama, but they keep ripping into Sarah Palin because the Republican party bought her some new clothes. Too bad Sarah isn&#039;t as rich as Michelle Obama and able to spend thousands of dollars on a dress.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s funny how the news papers have to retract a story that may not be totally accurate about Michelle Obama, but they keep ripping into Sarah Palin because the Republican party bought her some new clothes. Too bad Sarah isn&#8217;t as rich as Michelle Obama and able to spend thousands of dollars on a dress.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MrProsser</title>
		<link>http://www.anonymoushints.com/politics/michelle-obamas-447-snack/comment-page-1/#comment-339</link>
		<dc:creator>MrProsser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 00:54:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anonymoushints.com/blog/2008/10/23/michelle-obamas-447-snack/#comment-339</guid>
		<description>A lie and it has now been withdrawn:

http://www.nypost.com/seven/10212008/gossip/pagesix/room_disservice_134490.htm

I love all the blame being dumped on the source in the retraction.  What about the newspaper and the journalist who wrote the piece taking some responsibility?  Such a nonapology.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A lie and it has now been withdrawn:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nypost.com/seven/10212008/gossip/pagesix/room_disservice_134490.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.nypost.com/seven/10212008/gossip/pagesix/room_disservice_134490.htm</a></p>
<p>I love all the blame being dumped on the source in the retraction.  What about the newspaper and the journalist who wrote the piece taking some responsibility?  Such a nonapology.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  www.anonymoushints.com/2008/10/23/michelle-obamas-447-snack/feed/ ) in 0.34215 seconds, on Feb 10th, 2012 at 12:03 pm UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on Feb 10th, 2012 at 1:03 pm UTC -->
