The Wikileaks founder, Julian Assange, has been arrested in England for allegations of rape supposedly committed in Sweden. The charges are from two women he consensually slept with when he was at a seminar in Sweden. Afterwards the women went to the police saying that
he didn’t wear a condom. Could there be something deeper to this story? Could they be grasping at straws to find anything on Assange to hold him behind bars? What are they afraid of, the truth?

The Stockholm police want to question him regarding the possible rape of a woman and separate allegations from another Swedish admirer, with whom he was having a concurrent fling. But there remains a huge question mark over the evidence. Many people believe that the 39-year-old ­Australian-born whistleblower is the victim of a U.S. government dirty tricks campaign.

If you want proof of that just see how they refused Assahnge bail for not wearing a condom!

IN 1958 a young Rupert Murdoch, then owner and editor of Adelaide’s The News, wrote: “In the race between secrecy and truth, it seems inevitable that truth will always win.”

His observation perhaps reflected his father Keith Murdoch’s expose that Australian troops were being needlessly sacrificed by incompetent British commanders on the shores of Gallipoli. The British tried to shut him up but Keith Murdoch would not be silenced and his efforts led to the termination of the disastrous Gallipoli campaign.

Nearly a century later, WikiLeaks is also fearlessly publishing facts that need to be made public.

Every time WikiLeaks publishes the truth about abuses committed by US agencies,  politicians chant a provably false chorus with the State Department: “You’ll risk lives! National security! You’ll endanger troops!” Then they say there is nothing of importance in what WikiLeaks publishes. It can’t be both. Which is it?

If you have read any of the Afghan or Iraq war logs, any of the US embassy cables or any of the stories about the things WikiLeaks has reported, consider how important it is for all media to be able to report these things freely.

Here is the only picture I could find of one of Julian Assange’s accusers, Jessica. She is supposedly the blonde girl in the front row wearing a pink jumper.

Don’t shoot the messenger for revealing uncomfortable truths!

Wikileaks’ Julian Assange arrest read more here.

Charlie Sheen, the actor best know for his roles in Platoon and the tv series Two and a Half Men, has been arrested on charges of felony domestic abuse. Police had responded to a 911 call early Christmas morning.

“Carlos Irwin Estevez, also known as the actor Charles I. Sheen, was brought to the Pitkin County Colorado Jail for booking and incarceration following his arrest by the Aspen Police Department,”  sheriff’s patrol director Jeff Lumsden said in a statement.

Police said the victim was not hospitalized, and they did not release a name. TMZ is reporting — from an unnamed source — that the woman involved was Sheen’s third wife, Brooke Mueller. The actor married the real estate investor in 2008.

Sheen was arrested on felony charges of second-degree assault and menacing, and a misdemeanor count of criminal mischief, said Aspen police spokeswoman Stephanie Dasaro.

He will be held without bail in Colorado until he appears in court; the court system is closed for Christmas, and no date for his appearance has been set. [source]

Also, I just heard on the news, his wife, Brooke Mueller, refuses to press charges and that she was drunk at the time of the 911 call and said it was all just a big misunderstanding.

The police refuse to listen to her and are head strong on pressing charges and refusing to release the actor.

As many of you may not know, Charlie Sheen has been an out spoken critic of the official government investigation of the 9/11 terrorist attacks. He has posted videos and questions on the topic. You can read more about it here.

Could this be their way to show their disagreement with Charlie Sheen and the attention he has been bringing to the 9/11 terrorist attacks?